Description

Organisation Culture

Sep 2025 Examination

 

 

Q1. A multinational corporation has recently expanded its operations into several new countries. While the company’s dominant culture emphasizes innovation and open communication, local branches have developed subcultures that prioritize hierarchy and risk aversion. This has led to misunderstandings and reduced collaboration between headquarters and regional teams. The HR manager is tasked with harmonizing these cultural differences to improve organizational effectiveness. Based on the scenario, how should the HR manager apply Edgar Schein’s cultural model to address conflicts arising between the dominant culture and subcultures in a rapidly growing multinational organisation? (10 Marks)

Ans 1.

Introduction

As multinational corporations (MNCs) expand across diverse cultural landscapes, managing organizational culture becomes a strategic imperative. In this case, a global company that promotes innovation and open communication at its headquarters faces challenges integrating regional branches that emphasize hierarchy and risk aversion. These subcultural divergences hinder collaboration, decision-making, and overall organizational synergy. Organizational culture, as defined by Edgar Schein, is a layered construct that shapes shared assumptions, beliefs, and behaviors. The HR manager, acting as a cultural

Its Half solved only

Buy Complete assignment from us

Price – 290/  assignment

NMIMS Online University Complete SolvedAssignments  session SEPT  2025

buy cheap assignment help online from us easily

we are here to help you with the best and cheap help

Contact No – 8791514139 (WhatsApp)

OR

Mail us-  [email protected]

Our website – www.assignmentsupport.in

 

 

Q2. A start-up in the fintech sector has grown from 20 to 300 employees in two years. Initially, the founders fostered an informal culture with open communication and flexible roles. As the company expands, HR proposes introducing more formal policies, defined roles, and structured processes to maintain order. However, some employees fear this will stifle creativity and engagement, while others believe it is necessary for sustained growth. Critique the effectiveness of using formal and informal cultural components to drive employee engagement and performance in a rapidly growing start-up. Assess the potential risks and justify which approach should be prioritized as the organisation scales. (10 Marks)

Ans 2.

Introduction

Start-ups, particularly in dynamic sectors like fintech, often begin with an informal and flexible culture driven by the passion and agility of the founding team. In the early stages, open communication, fluid roles, and minimal bureaucracy fuel creativity, innovation, and rapid problem-solving. However, as the organization grows—as in this case from 20 to 300 employees—complexity increases, and the absence of structure can lead to confusion, inefficiencies, and accountability gaps. The HR department’s proposal to formalize structures is a natural response to the evolving needs of scale. Yet, this shift has sparked a cultural dilemma: whether to maintain informality to preserve engagement or adopt formal mechanisms to support sustainability. This analysis explores the role, effectiveness, and

 

 

Q3(A) A national bank has recently implemented a new set of corporate values, but employee surveys indicate that some departments are struggling to adopt them. The HR team wants to use established cultural models to identify the root causes of misalignment and develop targeted interventions. Create an action plan for using cultural models (such as Schein’s or Hofstede’s) to diagnose and address misalignments between dominant culture and subcultures in a large organisation. How would you ensure the plan is actionable and measurable? (5 Marks)

Ans 3a.

Introduction

When a national bank introduces new corporate values, success depends not only on communication but also on alignment across all departments. If subcultures within departments resist these values, organizational cohesion and performance suffer. In this scenario, the HR team must adopt systematic cultural models to uncover the root causes of misalignment and create interventions that promote consistency without ignoring local team dynamics. Using frameworks such as Edgar Schein’s three-layered model and

 

 

Q3(B) A large manufacturing firm has operated under a bureaucratic structure for decades, with strict hierarchies and well-defined roles. However, recent market disruptions require faster decision-making and greater cross-departmental collaboration. Many employees are accustomed to the existing culture and are hesitant about change. Create a strategy for transforming a bureaucratic organisation with a rigid dominant culture into a more collaborative and adaptive culture. What steps would you take to overcome resistance and ensure sustainable change? (5 Marks)

Ans 3b.

Introduction

In the face of rapid market disruptions, traditional bureaucratic structures can hinder agility and innovation. The challenge for a large manufacturing firm lies in transforming its rigid, hierarchical culture into one that embraces collaboration and adaptability. However, change is often met with resistance, especially from employees rooted in familiar ways. To lead this transformation successfully, the organization must implement a strategic, step-by-step plan that blends cultural change theory with practical, inclusive change management